Which would be better. No driver overhead issues with AMD cards; AMD cards play nicer with AMD CPUs which are now the best. I understand, that the performance of the AMD gpu's are not on the same level as the ones from the Nvidia's RTX 3 series when it comes to RayTracing. Visit our corporate site. 1. die 3080… RX 6900 XT vs. RTX 3080: Raytracing-Performance und aktuelle Spiele-Benchmarks . Why would I want the $999 RX6900XT that have both scores lower than $799 RTX3080 ? Posted in New Builds and Planning, By Started 39 minutes ago EVGA 3080 FTW3 ULTRA vs 6900 XT Referenz. Long and short, keep the 3080. I have budget for both. Tom's Hardware is supported by its audience. That gives them a serious advantage in situations where you might be struggling to keep up the frame rate. So the performance numbers mean nothing. Remember, just because I had good/bad experiences with these companies/product, doesn't mean you will have similar experiences too. If we consider the Ryzen 5900X + SAM data point, that gap shrinks to 6%, which is still not enough to catch the RTX 3090. NVIDIA's flagship, the RTX 3090, is still 8% faster. As a quick disclaimer, the Radeon RX 6900 XT numbers are from one submission, while the other graphics cards' scores are an average of the entries that users have submitted to Geekbench 5. 6900xt vs 3080. The gap in Vulkan performance is reportedly more substantial as the math shows 48.9% higher performance in the GeForce RTX 3080's favor. I don't think there's enough benefit to be had to warrant all the hassle of switching cards. RX 6800 XT is the slowest card here, but its performance is very close to RX 6900 XT in almost every game. In the benchmarks that AMD shared, the Radeon RX 6900 XT ties the GeForce RTX 3090 in 4K performance, but outperforms the Ampere offering at lower resolutions, such as 2560 x 1440. 6900 XT: RTX 3080: My key findings: The cards perform roughly the same in 4K. There was a problem. Hi, I am currently using an RTX 3080 and noticed that I am not getting very consistent FPS in some games. It is around 6% slower than RX 6900 XT on average. Keep your card, don't do that trade! I'll probably go with a 3080 but not against a 6800 XT if it's available sooner. I don’t like the 10gb of vram. Posted in Servers and NAS, By Posted in Audio, By Red is a nicer colour than green. At 4k , the 3080 with 10GB of G6DDRX/320-bit outperformed the 6800XT with 16gb of G6DDR/256-bit. emotionull I currently prefer the 6900xt because of superior rasterization, especially at 1440p. SteinerW If you think that the stock for the Radeon RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT was bad, the Radeon RX 6900 XT is expected to be even more limited in supply. DLSS is an Nvidia only feature, and it does make a pretty significant difference. Mid tower that can fit 2 280mm radiators? Consumers would find that the data shared on AMD’s website only show framerate. Future US, Inc. 11 West 42nd Street, 15th Floor, The margins seem plausible, considering that only eight Compute Units (CUs) or 512 SPs separate the two Navi-based graphics cards. Posted in Laptops and Pre-Built Systems, Linus Media Group Started 11 minutes ago I’d still take the 3080 over the 6800 XT though, since the 3080 does outperform the 6800 XT in most benchmarks. As always, we recommend treating the benchmarks with a bit of salt until a thorough review comes out. Meteteus The RX 6900-XT assumes the flagship position in AMD’s latest RX 6000 series of GPUs which deliver a huge generational jump in performance. I use my gpu more for gaming at 4K than productivity so Nvidia's DLSS is a technology that helps at those resolutions for higher frame rates. The numbers are a bit weird... particularly how the 6800XT manages to outperform the 6900XT in Geekbench 5 Vulkan. However, the latter surpassed the Big Navi flagship by up to 17.1% in Vulkan performance. © considering overclockers are easily getting these AMD cards with stock coolers and little effort to VASTLY outperform the stock settings, I'd say all these benches are junk. Learn more. I never use either of those features so I was thinking switching would be worth it to get more FPS on a 1440p Ultrawide display, Also, the 6900XT is slightly faster in raw performance, but not by very much. lowstrife Started 1 minute ago Meine Meinung: Da du "nur" die Chips auf den Karten nennst, was hindert dich daran Google zu nutzen und "3080 vs 6900 XT" einzugeben??? It's easy! All games tested at 3840 x 2160 (There's a typo in test setup screen that says ultrawide resolution). The Radeon RX 6900 XT is being launched at an SEP price of $999, which lets it sit in the vast pricing gorge between the $700 RTX 3080 and $1,500 RTX 3090. Doesn't make any sense. The RX 6900 XT can only log a five per cent win over the RTX 3070, with the RTX 3080 and RTX 3090 delivering 22.0 and 33.2 per cent performance advantages - … Apart from the scenarios shown here, I tested a lot of other scenarios and the 6900 XT never performed worse than the 3080. 4K-Differenz Testsiege; Radeon RX 6900 XT vs. GeForce RTX 3090 +10,8% zugunsten der 3090: 12/12 zugunsten der 3090: Radeon RX 6900 XT vs. GeForce RTX 3080 +1,4 % zugunsten der 6900XT: 10/14 zugunsten der 6900XT, 4/14 zugunsten der 3080 The introduction of the 128MB Infinity Cache is suppose to cushion the low memory bandwidth. Both the Radeon RX 6900 XT and RX 6800 XT are held within the 300W envelope so it stands to reason that a highly factory-overclocked Radeon RX 6800 XT could potentially get within an hairline to a reference Radeon RX 6900 XT. 4K-Differenz Testsiege; Radeon RX 6900 XT vs. GeForce RTX 3090 +10,8% zugunsten der 3090: 12/12 zugunsten der 3090: Radeon RX 6900 XT vs. GeForce RTX 3080 +1,4 % zugunsten der 6900XT: 10/14 zugunsten der 6900XT, 4/14 zugunsten der 3080: Radeon RX 6900 XT vs. Radeon RX 6800 XT +8,1% zugunsten der 6900XT: 14/14 zugunsten der 6900XT So, the 3090 with 24GB of G6DDRX/384-bit will likely outperform the 6900 XT by a larger margin, given it has the same 16gb of G6DDR/256-bit as the 6800XT. According to AMD, at 4K, both the RTX 3080 and RX 6800 XT perform on par with one another, with Nvidia pulling slightly ahead in some games … I heard that for gaming, the 6900 XT provides better raw performance or FPS but lags behind when it comes to Ray Tracing and DLSS. Tom's Hardware is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Is this accurate? 6900 XT is more expensive by about $300, so I can’t say I’m surprised it performs better lol. The 6900XT might beat out the 3080, but not by enough to make a huge difference. AMDs neues Top-Modell Radeon RX 6900 XT ist erschienen. Compared to other cards at 4K, we see 6900 XT 2% in front of RTX 3080—an important win. Stereo not working, unable to connect to hands free AG audio, Confused about measured core clock, memory clock vs. advertised speeds, remember, anime pic = can't be taken seriously. Started 16 minutes ago That said the 6900's MSRP is 300€ more than the 3080, so it … … Posted in Servers and NAS, By Either way your PSU is fine for either, if you don't care about ray tracing in a 6900 XT vs 3080 I'd say the 6900 wins easily. I do prefer the higher memory amount on the AMD gpu's because I don't want to pay for an RTX 3090 and RTX 3080's 10gb is on the edge of not being enough to load 4K textures in less than a year. The $1,000 USD 6900-XT offers a small improvement (11% more compute units) over the already launched $650 USD RX 6800-XT. When it comes to Ampere, the GeForce RTX 3080 just managed to outwit the Radeon RX 6900 XT by a 4.7% difference in the OpenCL benchmark. TV Gamer 2: Intel i3-10100 // ASRock H410M-HDV/M.2 // 16GB (2x8) DDR4 T-Force Vulcan 2666 // XFX RX 580 8GB XXX Edition // Rosewill FBM-X2 // Gigabyte P750GM // 480GB PNY CS1311 SSD/2TB Seagate HDD // Display: LG 50" 4k TV // Rii Wireless Mini Keyboard w/Touchpad/Xbox One Controllers Donated. We haven’t included other metrics to keep the chart legible, but the Minimum, Maximum, and 1%, and 0.1% lows are almost identical too. Started 31 minutes ago AMD has achieved the unthinkable: The RX 6900 XT is twice as fast as last generation's RX 5700 XT and more energy efficient. I thought the 6900 XT was on par with a 3090, are you sure you don't mean the 6800 XT? Close. Started 36 minutes ago This is just not the case. Please refresh the page and try again. I actually feel they should stop all these performance metrics on a card that is as rare as shark's toenail. At $999, the Radeon RX 6900 XT is a more attractive deal than the GeForce RTX 3090 that's selling for $1,499. BondiBlue RX 6900 XT gives RTX 3090 a tough fight and beats it in some games at both 1440p and 4K resolution. Take the RX 6900 XT Geekbench 5 numbers with a pinch of salt, as there is currently only a single submission for this card. Posted in Peripherals, By The RX 6900-XT assumes the flagship position in AMD’s latest RX 6000 series of GPUs which deliver a huge generational jump in performance. Especially for things like 4K gaming, the AMD cards have to run native, but with DLSS on, the Nvidia cards only have to render at 1080p-1440p and can produce nearly the same quality as native 4K.